When considering an application to change a matrimonial property regime, the court looks for sound reasons that justify the proposed change. These are some of the sound reasons that courts typically consider:
- Financial Planning and Management: The couple may demonstrate that changing their matrimonial property regime would allow for better financial planning and management of their assets and liabilities.
- Business Interests: If one or both spouses have business interests, they may argue that the change would better protect these interests or facilitate business growth.
- Protection of Assets: Couples may seek to protect their individual assets from potential creditors or liabilities of the other spouse.
- Changed Financial Circumstances: Significant changes in the financial situation of either spouse since the marriage, such as inheritance, business success, or career advancements, may justify a change in the property regime.
- Mutual Agreement and Benefit: The court will consider whether both spouses mutually agree to the change and if it would benefit both parties.
- Correction of an Oversight: If the couple intended to enter into a specific matrimonial property regime before marriage but failed to do so due to lack of knowledge or oversight, this could be considered a sound reason.
- Future Financial Planning: The couple may argue that the change would better suit their long-term financial goals and retirement planning.
- Equitable Distribution of Assets: In some cases, couples may seek to change their regime to ensure a more equitable distribution of assets and liabilities.
- Alignment With Current Circumstances: The couple may demonstrate that their current matrimonial property regime no longer aligns with their present circumstances and needs.
- Protection of Third Parties: If the change would better protect the interests of dependents or other third parties, this could be considered a sound reason.
It’s important to note that the court will scrutinise the reasons provided and assess whether they are genuine, well-motivated, and in the best interests of both parties. The court will also consider whether the proposed change would prejudice any creditors or other interested parties.
The onus is on the spouses to prove that they have good cause to change their marital property regime, and the final decision rests with the court’s discretion.